Chapter 1 - Existing
Stormwater Quality Management Overview
1.0 Initial Evaluation of Logansport's Stormwater
Quality Management
This
chapter describes the City of Logansport's stormwater
quality management efforts prior to the development and
implementation of the proposed Stormwater Quality
Management Plan (SWQMP) provided in the following
chapters.
The
following subsections are summaries of the material
presented in the City of Logansport's Part B submittal.
1.1 Current Stormwater Management
The
Logansport Stormwater Management Board was formed in
1992 and consists of three members. Logansport
Municipal Utility acts as their technical resource, as
do outside consultants.
The
Board uses a monthly user fee for stormwater. The fee
is a function of the imperviousness of a given land use.
Prior
to the development of the Stormwater Quality Management
Plan, the Logansport Stormwater Management Board did not
have a Stormwater Quality Ordinance.
1.2
MS4
Area Boundary Narrative
The MS4
Area boundary is defined as the City of Logansport's
corporate limits. The MS4 Area Boundary Narrative
Summary can be found in
Appendix A. The mapped
boundary of the MS4 area is shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map,
Appendix B.
1.3 Watersheds
United States Geological Survey National
Hydrogeological Database was used, and five primary
watersheds were identified within the City's corporate
limits. The 14-digit hydrogeological unit codes (HUCs)
and the names for the watersheds are:
1.
No.
05120105010010: Wabash River - Grants Run
2.
No.
05120104070070: Eel River - Horney Creek
3.
No.
05120101180040: Wabash River - Biddle Island
4.
No.
05120104070060: Eel River - Tick Creek
5.
No.
05120101180020: Wabash River - Rock Island
1.4 Receiving Streams
The following water bodies were identified in the Part
B submittal as receiving streams. There have been no
changes since that submittal.
1.
Wabash
River
2.
Eel
River
3.
Horney
Creek
4.
Goose
Creek
1.5 Outfalls
There
are no additional known stormwater outfalls to add since
the Part B submittal. For reference, the stormwater
outfalls are shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map,
Appendix B.
1.6 Estimate of the Linear Feet of MS4, Segregated by
Conveyance Type
The
City of Logansport has estimated that there are
approximately 35,900
linear feet (6.80
miles) of pipes and 2,200
linear feet (0.42
miles) of ditches. Therefore, the MS4 Conveyance system
is approximately 7.22
miles in length.
1.7
Description of Current Structural and Nonstructural BMPs
Logansport has one municipally owned and operated
retention basin. The retention basin is located at the
Logansport/Cass County Industrial Park. This retention
basin is effective in slowing down the discharge rate
from its watershed. Slowing down the discharge rate
helps to prevent erosion from high water velocities down
stream. The retention basin also settles out some
solids. By allowing pollutants to settle out of the
stormwater and preventing additional pollutants from
entering the stormwater via erosion downstream, this BMP
helps to improve the quality of Logansport's stormwater.
In
addition, catch basins are located throughout the
Logansport storm sewer system. These catch basins are
designed to allow sediment and other heavy materials to
drop out of the stormwater before they are conveyed
along the storm sewer. This BMP prevents a majority of
pollutants from being transported through the conveyance
system, thus improving the quality of Logansport's
stormwater.
An
initial evaluation of nonstructural BMPs was performed
as a part of the Part B submittal process. The current
nonstructural BMPs are generally described in Chapters 3
through 8. The existing nonstructural BMP programs were
reviewed for sufficiency. The programs were altered as
necessary to comply with the requirements of Rule 13.
1.8 Current Land Uses
Industrial Areas:
The industrial areas identified are shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map within
Appendix B. These will be
visually monitored for potential pollutants during the
ongoing characterization of this plan. Additional data
gathering from monitoring points along the receiving
streams may generate additional key observations.
Agricultural Areas:
The agricultural areas investigated are shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map within
Appendix B. These areas
will be visually monitored for potential pollutants
during the ongoing characterization of this plan. As
data is gathered from monitoring points along the
receiving streams, additional key observations may be
generated.
Existing Monitoring
Points:
Existing monitoring points and monitoring data were
evaluated. It was found that the existing monitoring
points and their corresponding data do not allow for
conclusions to be made about land usage and their effect
on stormwater quality. Additional monitoring points and
additional water testing associated with these
monitoring points is proposed. Proposed monitoring
locations are shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map,
Appendix B.
1.9 Sensitive
Areas
Sensitive areas that may need added water quality
protection considerations may include the following:
-
The
public surface drinking water intake that is located
upstream of the 10th Street Dam on the south
bank of the Eel River;
-
The Eel
River; it is listed on the State of Indiana's "Outstanding River List" for canoeing and boating. It
is not however on the "Outstanding State Resource Waters
List;"
-
The
Wabash River; it is listed on the State of Indiana's "Outstanding River List" as a Heritage Corridor. It is
not however on the "Outstanding State Resource Waters
List;"
-
The
public access site on the Eel River, located just
upstream of the 10th Street Dam which is used
for fishing, swimming and launching canoes;
-
The
Wabash River for canoeing;
-
Additional areas within the Eel and Wabash Rivers for
swimming, however there are no designated swimming areas
or beaches.
-
The
Little Turtle Waterway Plaza, for fishing and the Ducky
Derby during the Heritage Festival;
-
The
many bridges that cross the Eel and Wabash Rivers for
fishing; and
-
Goose
Creek for its swan habitat which is otherwise located on
private land.
These
sensitive areas are shown on the
MS4
Conditions Map in
Appendix B.
1.10
Areas Having Reasonable Potential for Causing Water Quality
Problems
Correlative
conclusions between existing water quality data and
potential problem areas could not be made from the existing
data that was gathered and analyzed. Monitoring point
locations were recommended in an effort to gather more
useful data. With the new data, identifying water quality
problem areas should be possible by the end of this 5-year
permit term.
The
City's ordinances establish legal authority to carry out
such activities as inspection, surveillance, and monitoring
or enforcement procedures necessary to ensure compliance
with the minimum control measures (MCMs) identified in the
following chapters.
1.11
Identification of Areas Causing Stormwater Pollution from
Existing Water Quality Data
Existing
water quality data was inconclusive; therefore, areas
suspected of causing stormwater pollution could not be
identified. Monitoring point locations were recommended in
an effort to gather more useful data. With the new data,
identifying areas causing stormwater pollution should be
possible in this 5-year permit term.
Previous Page - Appendix F
~
Back To List of Chapters
~
Next Page - Chapter 2